Managing SOC 2 compliance used to mean endless spreadsheets, screenshots, and sleepless nights before an audit. But in 2025, compliance has evolved from a tedious requirement into a competitive advantage.


For SaaS and tech companies, SOC 2 attestation proves to customers and investors that your security controls meet a high, trusted standard. The challenge is that achieving and maintaining SOC 2 manually takes significant time and effort. 


SOC 2 compliance software changes that.


The right platform automates evidence collection, maps controls to frameworks, and keeps your team audit-ready year-round. With automation, you can shorten audit prep from months to weeks, freeing up more time to focus on product and growth.


To find the best SOC 2 compliance tools, I researched and compared more than 30 platforms. I evaluated automation depth, user experience, pricing transparency, customer reviews, and scalability. These are the seven that stood out.

The best SOC 2 compliance software platforms

What makes the best SOC 2 software platform?

Our best software roundups are written by humans who test and analyze tools for a living. We don’t accept payments for placement or endorsements, only thorough research and hands-on evaluation.


Each SOC 2 platform had to meet the following requirements:


The seven tools below balance automation, usability, and credibility better than any others I reviewed.

Platform

Best for

Standout feature

Pricing

Scytale

Complete, AI-powered compliance automation with support

Auditor-built platform with full toolkit, proactive advisory, and a unique, next-gen AI GRC agent, Scy

Custom plans

Secureframe

Multi-framework compliance programs

Clean dashboards and evidence automation

From ~$8k/year

Sprinto

Startups tackling SOC 2 for the first time

Quick setup and supportive onboarding

Custom quote

Vanta

Large teams seeking broad automation and ecosystem support

Deep integrations and continuous monitoring

From ~$10k/year

Drata

Growing SaaS companies wanting sleek automation

Intuitive UI and 200+ integrations

From ~$6k/year

AuditBoard

Enterprise-grade audit and risk management

Robust GRC modules and workflows

Enterprise pricing

Strike Graph

Fast SOC 2 readiness and auditor collaboration

Built-in templates and guided workflows

Custom quote


1. Scytale (Web, macOS, Windows)


Scytale pros:


Scytale cons:


Scytale is an AI-powered compliance automation platform built by auditors for tech companies that want the whole GRC management process handled in one place. While most compliance tools rely purely on automation, Scytale pairs technology with human advisory support. Every plan includes a dedicated compliance expert who manages timelines, follows up on evidence, and keeps audits on track so your internal team doesn’t have to.


The interface is designed to simplify what’s usually complex. Scytale organizes every phase of compliance into a guided, centralized workspace that covers everything from complex integrations and gap remediation to the official SOC 2 audit. Progress meters, evidence tracking, and Slack notifications make it easy to see what’s left to do.


Beyond SOC 2, Scytale supports other critical frameworks such as ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR, enabling companies to manage multiple compliance goals from a single dashboard. Each subscription includes automation features such as evidence collection, risk assessments, vendor risk management, access reviews, multi-framework cross-mapping, and a fully customizable Trust Center that lets you showcase your security and compliance posture in minutes.


What makes Scytale different is its proactive advisory model. Rather than answering questions reactively, its dedicated team of GRC experts hold regular check-ins, guiding you through every compliance requirement and ensuring you remain audit-ready. Combined with transparent pricing and a fully-featured plan, Scytale provides one of the most comprehensive SOC 2 experiences available.


Scytale pricing: Custom plans with all-inclusive features and dedicated advisory support.

2. Secureframe (Web, macOS, Windows)


Secureframe pros:


Secureframe cons:


Secureframe combines broad framework support with an approachable interface. Its automation engine connects to common SaaS and cloud systems to gather evidence and monitor security controls automatically. Teams get real-time notifications when a control fails, helping to resolve issues long before audit season.


The platform’s dashboards are among the cleanest in the category, showing exactly how close you are to being audit-ready. Secureframe also includes policy templates and a built-in document library that simplifies policy management for smaller companies.


Another advantage is its scalability. Organizations that start with SOC 2 can later add ISO 27001 or HIPAA without migrating to a new system. The cross-mapping of controls means work done for one framework often counts toward another, saving time.


For teams that want automation, a friendly user experience, and credible support without enterprise complexity, Secureframe is a reliable choice.


Secureframe pricing: Typically starts around $8,000 per year, based on company size.

3. Sprinto (Web, macOS, Windows)


Sprinto pros:


Sprinto cons:


Sprinto focuses on helping new startups get audit-ready quickly. It's guided onboarding walks users through SOC 2 preparation with straightforward instructions and pre-built templates. You can connect your existing systems, assign tasks, and monitor control health from one dashboard.


One of Sprinto’s main strengths is its automation. It monitors connected systems continuously and flags issues such as expired employee access or misconfigured permissions. This helps small teams maintain compliance with minimal manual work.


Sprinto’s customer success team also receives positive reviews for its responsiveness and clarity. Many users say they completed their first audit faster than expected because Sprinto kept the process structured and transparent.


Although it lacks the advanced analytics of larger tools, Sprinto is ideal for small teams tackling compliance for the first time. It offers enough automation to make SOC 2 achievable without overwhelming new users.


Sprinto pricing: Custom quote based on company size and number of frameworks

4. Vanta (Web, macOS, Windows)

Vanta pros:


Vanta cons:


Vanta is one of the most recognizable names in SOC 2 compliance automation, trusted by thousands of startups and enterprises. Its platform connects to cloud infrastructure, developer tools, HR systems, and identity providers to continuously collect evidence. This means your controls are always up to date rather than being manually checked right before the audit.


Vanta’s biggest strength is its scale. With more than 7,000 customers, the company has built an unmatched ecosystem of auditors and security partners. That size translates into reliable templates, pre-mapped controls, and the comfort of working with a tool auditors already know.


Teams appreciate Vanta’s detailed dashboards and clear progress tracking. You can filter controls by owner, due date, or risk level, which helps maintain accountability across departments. Continuous monitoring ensures that if an employee leaves or a configuration change occurs, alerts trigger instantly.


Although Vanta excels at automation, advisory and remediation assistance come through partners, not directly from the platform. Still, for organizations that value automation depth and integration variety, Vanta remains a leading option.


Vanta pricing: Starts around $10,000 per year, depending on company size and framework count.

5. Drata (Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android)

Drata pros:


Drata cons:


Drata has gained a strong reputation for balancing automation and simplicity. Its clean dashboard guides users through readiness, gap remediation, and audit management with minimal setup time. The interface is modern, with color-coded controls and progress summaries that make tracking compliance straightforward.


Drata integrates with tools like AWS, GitHub, Okta, and Jira to automatically collect and verify evidence. The system continuously monitors these integrations and flags any non-compliant configurations. It also includes policy templates, a risk register, and built-in reminders that keep teams on track year-round.


One area where Drata shines is user experience. Navigation feels natural, even for people new to compliance. Setting up integrations takes minutes, and the dashboard’s automation summaries make it easy to understand where you stand before an audit.


Although Drata doesn’t include hands-on advisory, its automation depth and speed make it ideal for fast-moving startups and scale-ups. For companies that prioritize usability and clean design, Drata is one of the most efficient SOC 2 automation tools available.


Drata pricing: Begins around $6,000 per year for SOC 2 readiness.

6. AuditBoard (Web, macOS, Windows)


AuditBoard pros:


AuditBoard cons:


AuditBoard is a comprehensive GRC platform that goes beyond SOC 2 to cover internal audits, SOX compliance, and enterprise risk management. It centralizes audit processes, control testing, and documentation so large organizations can manage multiple compliance frameworks simultaneously.


The platform’s workflow engine is its standout feature. Teams can create customized review and approval steps, assign controls to different departments, and generate audit reports in one place. Built-in collaboration tools let stakeholders comment directly on controls or evidence, reducing back-and-forth emails.


AuditBoard’s reporting and analytics are also strong. Dashboards provide risk heat maps and trend reports that help leadership understand compliance posture at a glance. This makes it well-suited to enterprises that treat compliance as a continuous operational process rather than a once-a-year task.


Because of its scope, AuditBoard can be complex to configure, but for organizations with mature compliance teams, it delivers unmatched visibility and control.


AuditBoard pricing: Enterprise pricing available upon request.

7. Strike Graph (Web, macOS, Windows)

Strike Graph pros:


Strike Graph cons:


Strike Graph is designed to simplify SOC 2 readiness for smaller teams that need structure and speed. Instead of starting from scratch, you can use its pre-built control libraries and templates tailored to SOC 2’s Trust Services Criteria. This helps teams map their controls quickly and understand what’s required for certification.


Where Strike Graph shines is in collaboration. The platform includes built-in tools for sharing documentation and communicating with auditors directly within the app. This reduces the typical back-and-forth of collecting clarifications or additional evidence.


Strike Graph’s dashboards track progress by control category, showing which evidence is complete and what remains outstanding. The tool focuses on clarity and accountability, which can make the difference for smaller teams handling their first audit.


While Strike Graph lacks the automation depth of tools like Scytale, its structured approach and auditor visibility make it a helpful choice for companies that want clear guidance and fast results.


Strike Graph pricing: Custom quote depending on organization size and needs.

Which SOC 2 compliance software should you use?

Every organization’s compliance journey is different. If you need AI-powered automation paired with expert guidance, Scytale is the most comprehensive all-in-one choice for SaaS businesses of all sizes.


Before deciding, think carefully about your internal resources, future framework goals, and available budget. Consider whether your team has in-house compliance expertise or would benefit from more hands-on advisory support. Assess if you plan to expand into frameworks like ISO 27001, HIPAA, or GDPR, and determine whether your priority is simplicity today or scalability for the long term.


By selecting a solution that aligns with your GRC workflow and goals, you can turn compliance from a yearly headache into a continuous advantage.