Ranking crypto “investment” by country is difficult. Since on-chain value flows are better than survey guesswork, I use Chainalysis’s regional and national tallies, supported by additional internet research. Admittedly, the time period for the Chainalysis figures ends in June 2024, but it gives us a rough idea of who uses the most crypto. These are rough estimates:

We see that the U.S. writes the headline numbers, though large emerging markets are catching up.

What would these figures look like if adjusted for population? Here is the per capita breakdown (source):

While India has the largest number of crypto owners (93.5 million people), on a per-capita basis, small, tech-savvy hubs such as the UAE, Singapore, and Vietnam punch far above their GDP weight. Export heavyweights like Japan and Germany lag. Regulatory clarity and mobile-first finance, not just income, drive adoption.

Lessons for Regulators:

Based on the first round of mainstream crypto adoption, we have a good idea of what good and bad pro-crypto regimes look like:

A. Pro-crypto regulatory regimes with good outcomes:

B. Pro-crypto regulatory regimes with bad outcomes

C. Mixed regulatory regimes

D. Prohibitive regulatory regime:

4. The Coming Paradox

Governments are finally warming to blockchain’s efficiency. Yet, they fear its independence and decentralization. So, we are seeing the emergence of government-backed blockchains:

Crypto’s headline numbers, both absolute (like $750 bn into U.S. wallets) and per-capita (like one in three Emiratis), keep increasing.

However, many of the traits that made Bitcoin intoxicating in 2013, like permissionlessness and monetary policy outside political reach, are being watered down. Some feel that Bitcoin’s “ideology” is being sacrificed for its “adoption.”

Lessons for Regulators

Countries that blend clarity with credibility — i.e., enough freedom for builders while ensuring that there are enough guardrails for institutions — will succeed in attracting crypto flows, entrepreneurs, and ecosystems. Regulatory regimes that are prescriptive by being too “pro-crypto” risk chaos, while those that are unclear or prohibitive risk missing out on the next wave in fintech.

Shaan Ray