If you haven't realized it yet, this is a crazy market!
However, beyond short-term volatility driven by liquidity and macroeconomic trends. 
There are a few interesting takes from the latest financial releases of Google, Facebook, and Amazon. 
Let's see some of them!
Google’s parent company, Alphabet, released its end-of-year financials. Looking at its financials is important for various reasons and some of them are:
Let’s dive into them.

Google’s profitability

Google’s profitability has slightly improved in 2021, thanks to the fact it managed to increase its revenue faster than it increased its operational costs, as traffic on its platforms increased substantially during 2020-2021. We’ll see in this in-depth analysis why that’s the case.
First of all, for the first time in its history, Google generated over $257 billion in revenues. And the company almost reached a two trillion market capitalization. For some context, when Google IPOed in 2004, it recorded almost a billion in revenues, and it was worth about $23 billion, as it popped at its IPO date to $85 per share (On February 2nd, 2022, a Google stock is worth $2,958.22).
At the time, in 2004, Google had just managed to scale its advertising machine comprised mainly of GoogleAdWords (today Google Ads) and Google AdSense. At the time the advertising machine was primarily based on Internet traffic from desktop devices. That was a completely different world.
As we’ll see throughout this analysis, today most traffic comes from mobile. And Google’s mobile ads platforms (Google AdMob) play a key role. So let’s dive a bit into the main financial segments of Google.

Google’s main segments in 2021

In 2021, the Google advertising machine, generated over $209 billion in revenues. This represented an over 42% growth, year over year! This is a massive improvement for a company worth almost two trillion. In a market landscape that is not anymore in favor of digital advertising. How did Google pull this off?
We’ll see this shortly. But for now, let’s emphasize a few key points.
Today the Google advertising machine is comprised of three main products:
As we’ll see understanding the difference among these segments helps us understand how Google manages its cost structure for each segment.
What determines the growth of each segment?
Let’s see how, a little bit more in detail, ad monetization changed for Google.
In 2021, two main factors determined the improvement in ad monetization by Google.
First, Google recorded an increase in paid clicks (driven by an increase in user adoption and search queries primarily on mobile devices).
Second, this also drove more paid clicks in AdMob through the Google Play store.
Third, as we saw Google is testing various ad formats (we can argue it’s showing more ads) both on Google’s products and YouTube, which slightly improved monetization.
Among the other revenues, instead, Google Cloud also recorded an important growth thanks to the Google Cloud Platform.
Let’s look now at the other side, the cost structure.

Google’s cost structure

When it comes to Google its cost structure is pretty straightforward. In order to keep its operations profitable, it needs to be able to generate traffic at much lower costs, than it can monetize it.
In 2021, Google traffic acquisition costs (the spending needed to run the servers, for its main products, and the deals in place to enable the distribution for its main products) were over $45 billion.
In respect to advertising revenues, its traffic acquisition costs were 22% of its advertising revenues in 2020. In 2021, instead, the traffic acquisition costs decreased to 21.7% compared to its revenues.
This might seem a little difference. Yet, Google managed to lower its traffic acquisition costs, nonetheless its much wider users’ adoption.
This shows that a lot of that adoption was organic, and based on strong deals the company has in place.
The other cost of revenues instead was mainly driven by improved content acquisition costs and costs in data centers.
In terms of profitability, it’s interesting to notice, how, at a wider scale, Google Services has huge margins.
That’s because as we saw in the previous paragraph, Google managed to improve monetization for users, it saw mobile users’ growth, while it managed to lower its traffic acquisition costs!
This combination led to an improved marginality.
However, it’s also interesting to notice how the Google Advertising machine is the only one running at positive margins.
Where instead, both the Google Cloud platform and the other Google Bets run at negative margins. Important to distinguish here.
The Google Cloud platform is critical for the future success of the Google AI platform.
When it comes to the other bets those instead are breakthroughs that Alphabet is pursuing with a long-term perspective. Those are money-losing bets for now but might turn into something interesting in the coming decade.

Facebook

How much will Facebook (now Meta) lose as a consequence of Apple's policy change?
At least $10 billion in 2022!

This is for Facebook alone.

For some context, Apple now requires apps to explicitly ask users if they want to be tracked, while before the consent was given by default.

As Facebook highlighted in its latest financials:

"with Apple's iOS changes and new regulation in Europe, there's a clear trend where less data is available to deliver personalized ads...
...Like others in our industry, we faced headwinds as a result of Apple iOS changes...
...Apple created two challenges for advertisers: one is that the accuracy of our ads targeting decreased, which increased the cost of driving outcomes; the other is that measuring those outcomes became more difficult. These challenges are complex and interrelated. We're working to try and improve things..."


And they further explained:

"For example, by making progress in closing the underreporting gap for iOS web conversions and by introducing tools like our aggregated event measurement solutions to deliver better insights for advertisers..."

And finally, they put a number on it:

"And, you know, we believe the impact of iOS overall as a headwind on our business in 2022 is on the order of $10 billion, so it's a pretty significant headwind for our business. And, you know, we're seeing that impact, you know, in a number of verticals..."

Summing things up for the digital advertising landscape:

Some key highlights from the latest financials of Google (Alphabet) and Facebook (Meta) also show some of the changes in the digital advertising landscape. This, in turn, is affecting millions of small businesses across the world:

Who might benefit? Let’s draw some key points:

What about Amazon?

Some interesting takes from Amazon's financials as it closed the year. No wonder Jeff Bezos picked up Andy Jessy (the current CEO) as his successor. Andy Jessy has led AWS since its inception in 2003!
In Q4, Amazon online stores stalled compared to the previous year (hint: the pandemic contributed to the 2020 boost).
Can you guess what's next?
Also Published Here