Cell Service Is Escaping Earth

Mobile phones have always been limited by ground infrastructure. The cellular revolution, while powerful, is geographically restricted, leading to significant signal gaps outside major cities, in parks, or offshore. The vast network of towers and cables is constrained by population density and challenging terrain, making it neither profitable nor physically possible to build infrastructure in remote areas like the Chihuahuan Desert or the Uinta Mountains..1

But a radical shift is underway, one that promises to redraw the map of human connectivity. Above our heads, a new industrial revolution is taking place in Low Earth Orbit (LEO). The "dead zone," that frustrating relic of 20th-century infrastructure, is being systematically erased by a new breed of spacecraft. This is the era of Direct-to-Device (D2D) satellite connectivity.

The premise sounds like science fiction: standard, unmodified smartphones—the same slabs of glass and silicon currently sitting in our pockets—can now communicate directly with satellites traveling at 17,000 miles per hour, hundreds of miles overhead. There are no proprietary dongles, no heavy satellite phones with chunky external antennas, and no specialized apps required to make the initial handshake. To the phone, the satellite looks like just another cell tower, albeit one that is flying through the vacuum of space.2

This report explores the mechanics, the physics, and the politics of this connectivity revolution. We will dismantle the engineering challenges of closing a link budget from 500 kilometers away, analyze the massive phased array antennas unfolding in orbit, and navigate the complex spectrum wars being fought in the halls of the FCC. We will look at the heavyweights—SpaceX’s Starlink, AST SpaceMobile, and the newly rebranded Amazon Leo—and the regulatory frameworks trying to keep order in the crowded skies.

The era of "No Service" might be ending. Here is how we are building the network of the future.

Part I: The Physics of the Impossible Link

To understand why connecting a smartphone to a satellite is such a monumental engineering achievement, we must first appreciate why it was considered impossible for so long. The cellular networks we use today were designed with a very specific set of assumptions: the base station (tower) is stationary, the user is relatively close (typically within 1 to 5 kilometers), and the power available to the tower is effectively unlimited.

Move the base station to Low Earth Orbit, and every single one of those assumptions breaks.

The Inverse Square Law and the Decibel Deficit

The most formidable adversary in satellite communications is geometry. Radio waves spreading out from an antenna follow the Inverse Square Law: the power intensity of the signal decreases with the square of the distance.

A typical terrestrial cell tower is perhaps 3 kilometers (roughly 2 miles) from your phone. A Starlink satellite orbits at approximately 550 kilometers (340 miles). This is not a linear increase in difficulty; it is exponential. The signal path is nearly 200 times longer. By the time a signal travels from a smartphone—which transmits at a maximum power of about 0.2 watts (23 dBm)—to the satellite, it has attenuated significantly.

In engineering terms, this is a "Link Budget" crisis. The link budget is the accounting sheet of wireless communication: gains minus losses. Smartphones have omnidirectional antennas with very low gain (typically -3 to 0 dBi) because they need to receive signals from any direction.4 They cannot focus their energy at a satellite.

To close this link, the burden of performance shifts entirely to the satellite. The spacecraft must possess "ears" of extraordinary sensitivity. This necessitates the use of high-gain antennas. According to the Friis Transmission Formula, which governs radio transmission, to compensate for the massive free-space path loss, the receiving antenna (the satellite) must have a massive aperture.6

This is the fundamental divergence in the industry. AST SpaceMobile has bet its company on aperture size, deploying satellites that unfold into 2,400-square-foot arrays—the size of a tennis court—to achieve gains north of 40 dBi.7 SpaceX, conversely, relies on a swarm of smaller, but still highly advanced, satellites to achieve similar results through density and beamforming.9

The Doppler Scream

If the distance weren't enough, there is the speed. LEO satellites are not stationary; they are in freefall around the planet, moving at roughly 7.5 kilometers per second (17,000 mph).

Terrestrial cellular protocols (LTE and 5G) are robust, but they assume the tower is fixed. They can handle a user in a speeding car, or even a high-speed train (up to 300-500 km/h). They are not designed for a base station moving at Mach 22.

This relative motion creates a massive Doppler Shift. Just as the siren of an ambulance rises in pitch as it approaches and drops as it passes, the radio frequency of the satellite shifts dramatically. For a standard LTE signal, this shift is measured in tens of kilohertz—enough to push the signal completely out of the "subcarriers" that the phone is listening to. If uncorrected, the phone would see the satellite's signal as noise, or it would fail to lock onto the carrier frequency entirely.10

The "magic" of D2D technology is Doppler Pre-Compensation. The satellite (or the ground network controlling it) calculates the precise position of the user relative to the satellite's trajectory. Before the satellite transmits a signal to the phone, it artificially shifts the frequency in the opposite direction of the expected Doppler effect. If the satellite is approaching the user (causing a blue shift, or higher frequency), it transmits at a slightly lower frequency. By the time the wave hits the user's phone, the motion of the satellite has compressed the wave back to the exact nominal frequency the phone expects.12

The satellite is essentially "lying" to the phone, warping the physics of the signal so that the dumb terminal on the ground thinks it is talking to a stationary tower next door.

The Timing Advance Conundrum

Cellular networks rely on strict timing synchronization. In LTE and 5G, data is sent in frames. To prevent data from different phones colliding at the tower, the network assigns each phone a "Timing Advance" (TA)—an instruction to transmit slightly early so the signal arrives at the exact right millisecond.

The LTE standard limits the maximum Timing Advance to a value that corresponds to a cell radius of roughly 100 kilometers. A satellite at 550 km altitude (and potentially 1,000 km slant range if it’s near the horizon) vastly exceeds this limit. A standard phone simply cannot apply a large enough Timing Advance to synchronize with a satellite.13

To solve this, D2D operators again resort to spoofing. The network must modify the control signals to accommodate these "illegal" delays, often by handling the timing buffering entirely on the satellite side or by utilizing specific enhancements in newer cellular standards (3GPP Release 17) that introduce "Non-Terrestrial Network" (NTN) parameters.15

Part II: The Hardware in the sky

The solution to these physics problems has taken the form of two competing engineering philosophies: the "Swarm" of SpaceX and the "Giant" of AST SpaceMobile.

SpaceX Starlink: The Swarm Approach

SpaceX has leveraged its unprecedented launch cadence to flood the sky with hardware. The Starlink constellation, as of early 2026, comprises over 9,400 active satellites.16

The V2 Mini Satellite:

The workhorse of SpaceX’s D2D ambition is the "V2 Mini." Despite the name, these are not small spacecraft. Weighing approximately 800 kg (1,760 lbs) and spanning 30 meters (100 feet) when their solar arrays are unfurled, they are "mini" only in comparison to the future Starship-class satellites.17

The V2 Mini is equipped with a specially designed phased array antenna that operates in the terrestrial PCS G Block spectrum (1910–1915 MHz uplink, 1990–1995 MHz downlink).18

• eNodeB in Space: Unlike older "bent-pipe" satellites that simply acted as mirrors reflecting signals to a ground station, the V2 Mini carries an "eNodeB" payload. It functions as a flying cell tower modem, capable of processing LTE signals onboard.2
• Argon Thrusters: To maintain their precise orbits and combat atmospheric drag, these satellites use argon-fueled Hall effect thrusters, a cheaper and more abundant propellant than the krypton used in previous generations.9

SpaceX’s strategy is density. By having thousands of satellites, they ensure that even if one satellite is too far away or at a bad angle, another is rising above the horizon. This density allows for aggressive frequency reuse and lowers the demand on any single satellite.20

AST SpaceMobile: The Macro-Cell in the Sky

If SpaceX is building a swarm of bees, AST SpaceMobile is building eagles. Their philosophy is that the most efficient way to close the link budget with a weak smartphone is to put the largest possible antenna in space.

The BlueBird Satellites:

AST’s engineering marvels are the "BlueBird" series. The initial five commercial satellites (BlueBird 1-5) feature phased array antennas spanning 693 square feet. The next generation (Block 2), launched starting in late 2025/early 2026, expands this to a staggering 2,400 square feet.7

• The Micron Architecture: These arrays are built from modular "microns." Each micron is a self-contained unit with antennas, solar cells, and processing power. They are tiled together to form the massive array. This design provides redundancy; if one micron fails, the rest of the array continues to function.
• Gain and Power: AST claims their massive aperture delivers gains "north of 40 dBi," compared to the ~16 dBi of a standard terrestrial tower.8 This allows them to project distinct, high-power spot beams onto the ground.
• The ASIC Advantage: At the heart of the BlueBird is the "AST5000" Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC). This custom chip handles the immense signal processing load required to beamform thousands of cells simultaneously, supporting up to 120 Mbps peak data rates per cell.7

Project Kuiper / Amazon Leo

Amazon, rebranding its Project Kuiper to "Amazon Leo" in late 2025, has entered the fray with the financial might of one of the world's largest companies.22 While initially focused on dedicated terminals (like the Starlink dish), Amazon has pivoted to include D2D capabilities.

• Constellation: Amazon plans 3,236 satellites. FCC mandates require half to be launched by mid-2026.23
• Technology: Amazon has focused on Ka-band for backhaul and broadband, but is integrating terrestrial spectrum capabilities to compete with Starlink. Their "Leo" satellites also utilize optical inter-satellite links (lasers) to create a mesh network in space.22

Part III: The Spectrum Wars and the SCS Framework

Technology is useless without permission. The radio spectrum is the most heavily regulated real estate in the world. For a century, regulators like the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) strictly separated "Satellite" spectrum (like Ku and Ka bands) from "Terrestrial" spectrum (like the 700 MHz and 800 MHz bands used by cell phones).

D2D breaks this rule. It blasts terrestrial frequencies from space.

The "Supplemental Coverage from Space" (SCS) Order

In March 2024, the FCC adopted the SCS Report and Order, a historic piece of regulation that created a legal pathway for this technology.1 This framework essentially legalizes the "lease" model.

How it Works:

1. The Lease: A satellite operator (like SpaceX) cannot simply apply for terrestrial spectrum. They must sign a lease with a terrestrial license holder (like T-Mobile).
2. Geographically Independent Areas (GIA): The lease must cover a "Geographically Independent Area," such as the entire Continental United States (CONUS). This prevents a chaotic patchwork where a satellite beam covers a T-Mobile user in one county but interferes with a Verizon tower in the next.25
3. Secondary Status: This is the most critical clause. SCS operations are "secondary." This means they must not cause harmful interference to primary terrestrial operations. If a T-Mobile tower on the ground detects interference from a Starlink satellite, the satellite must yield. The satellite has no right to protection from the ground network.26

The Bands: Low vs. Mid

The physics of radio waves dictates that lower frequencies travel further and penetrate obstacles better.

• Low Band (AST SpaceMobile): AST has partnered with AT&T and Verizon to use the 700 MHz and 850 MHz bands.27 These "beachfront" frequencies are excellent for penetrating building walls, foliage, and car roofs. This gives AST a theoretical coverage advantage in difficult terrain.4
• Mid Band (Starlink): SpaceX is using the 1900 MHz PCS G Block via T-Mobile.18 Higher frequencies struggle more with obstructions. This is why Starlink's service is more sensitive to tree cover and requires a clearer line of sight.28

The Interference Nightmare: Radio Astronomy

While regulators worry about cell towers, astronomers worry about the universe. The night sky is becoming deafeningly loud in the radio spectrum.

"Unintended electromagnetic radiation"—noise generated by the onboard electronics, inverters, and power systems of satellites—is leaking into protected radio astronomy bands. Researchers using the LOFAR telescope have detected this "hum" from Starlink satellites, noting that it is millions of times more intense than deep-space sources.30

The International Astronomical Union (IAU) has warned that if mega-constellations grow as planned, they could render significant portions of radio and optical data unusable. Light pollution is also a factor; the massive arrays of AST’s BlueBirds reflect sunlight, appearing as some of the brightest objects in the night sky, creating streaks that ruin optical telescope exposures.32

Part IV: Real-World Performance (The Beta Verdict)

The theory is sound, and the satellites are up. But what is it like to actually use a cell tower in space? In 2024 and 2025, beta testers across the United States began connecting to "T-Mobile Starlink" and AST networks. The results are a mix of technological miracles and early-adopter frustrations.

The "One Bar" Experience

Testers accessing the T-Mobile Starlink network often see their signal bars drop to zero, only for a new network name to appear: "T-Mobile SpaceX SAT".29

• Texting (SMS): The primary function available during the beta is SMS. Reviews indicate that it works, but patience is required. "The first several texts I sent and received were instant... After the first round, I started seeing some significant delays," reported a reviewer at Dishy Tech. Delays can range from a few seconds to 10 minutes depending on satellite availability.29
• Line of Sight: The connection is fragile. Users reported that standing under heavy tree cover or even inside a car with a metal roof can degrade the signal. "Connection to the Starlink satellites is kind of spotty currently," noted a PCMag tester. The phone must often be held up or oriented specifically to catch the signal from a passing satellite.18

The Voice and Video Surprise

While officially texting-only, enterprising testers have pushed the limits. PCMag reporters managed to conduct WhatsApp video calls over the Starlink D2D link.

• Quality: The video was described as "grainy" (144p or 240p) and prone to freezing.
• Stability: Calls often dropped after a few minutes as the satellite moved out of view or the bandwidth fluctuated.
• The Verdict: Despite the low quality, the reviewer described the experience as "mind-blowing." Making a video call from a documented dead zone without specialized hardware proved the concept is viable.34

Speed and Latency

Current tests show data rates are low—sufficient for text, basic weather data, or slow-loading social media feeds, but not yet ready for 4K streaming. Starlink's "swarm" approach currently suffers from gaps between satellites, leading to intermittent service. AST SpaceMobile, with its larger arrays, promises higher throughput (120 Mbps), but widespread user verification is pending the full deployment of their Block 2 satellites in 2026.7

Part V: Standardization and the Road to 6G

Currently, SpaceX and AST are using proprietary "hacks" to make LTE work from space. However, the future is standardized. The 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP)—the global body that defines cellular standards—is writing satellites into the code of the mobile network.

Release 17: The NTN Breakthrough

Finalized in 2022, 3GPP Release 17 introduced native support for "Non-Terrestrial Networks" (NTN).13 This standard allows phones and chips to natively understand they are talking to a satellite.

• Pre-Compensation on Device: Instead of the satellite doing all the work, Rel-17 capable phones can calculate their own Doppler shift and Timing Advance, relieving the processing burden on the satellite.15
• IoT NTN: This release also standardized narrow-band IoT over satellite, enabling cheap, battery-efficient trackers for shipping containers and agriculture.36

Release 18 and 19: Toward 6G

Release 18 (5G Advanced) and the upcoming Release 19 (expected freeze late 2025) add sophisticated features like Regenerative Payloads and Mobility Enhancements.

• Regenerative Payloads: Current D2D is mostly "transparent" (bent-pipe)—the satellite mirrors the signal to a ground gateway. Future standards support the satellite acting as a full base station (gNodeB), decoding data onboard and routing it via inter-satellite lasers. This reduces latency and reliance on local ground stations.13
• 6G Integration: By 2030, 6G standards aim to treat satellites as a fully integrated layer. Your phone will not "switch" to satellite; it will simultaneously use terrestrial and satellite links to maximize bandwidth and reliability, a concept known as the Single Network Future.38

Part VI: Global Deployment and Future Outlook

The race is global. While the FCC has led with the SCS framework, other nations are moving fast.

• New Zealand: One NZ (formerly Vodafone NZ) has partnered with Starlink to offer text services covering 100% of the country, a vital capability for a nation prone to earthquakes and rugged terrain.
• Japan: Rakuten Mobile is a key investor in AST SpaceMobile and plans to use the service to cover the mountainous Japanese archipelago, where terrestrial towers are expensive to maintain.40
• Canada: Rogers has partnered with Lynk and Starlink to cover the vast northern territories.
• Nigeria: Amazon Leo has secured a license to begin operations in Feb 2026, marking a major entry into the African market where fiber infrastructure is often lacking.42

The Roadmap: 2026 and Beyond

The Economic Question

The technology works, but does the business model? Building and launching thousands of satellites costs tens of billions of dollars.

• The Market: Analysts project the direct-to-satellite market could reach $168 billion by 2035, driven not just by emergency texts, but by ubiquitous IoT (asset tracking), automotive connectivity, and premium "always-on" subscriptions for enterprise users.24
• The "Premium" Add-On: MNOs like T-Mobile have indicated that basic safety features might be free on high-tier plans, but high-speed data from space will likely be a paid add-on, similar to international roaming.45

Conclusion

We are witnessing the end of an era. The "Dead Zone," a defining feature of the mobile age, is being engineered out of existence. Through a combination of brute-force launch capability, elegant engineering "hacks," and regulatory maneuvering, the sky is becoming a seamless extension of the ground network.

For the hiker injured in the backcountry, the farmer monitoring crops in a remote valley, or the first responder in a hurricane-ravaged city where towers have failed, this is not just a technological curiosity—it is a lifeline. The phone in your pocket is about to become a truly planetary device. The sky is no longer the limit; it is the network.

Appendix 1: The Titans of Direct-to-Device (Comparison)

Appendix 2: FCC Supplemental Coverage from Space (SCS) Eligible Bands

References

1. FCC ADVANCES SUPPLEMENTAL COVERAGE FROM SPACE FRAMEWORK,  https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-401208A1.pdf
2. Samsung enters the war: Starlink Direct to Cell Goes Live in Ukraine,  https://www.gizchina.com/samsung/samsung-enters-the-war-starlink-direct-to-cell-goes-live-in-ukraine
3. White Paper on Satellite Direct-to-Device Services | Wireless Infrastructure Association,  https://wia.org/satellite-d2d-and-terrestrial/
4. Direct-to-device satellite service: a complement to mobile networks - Telefónica,  https://www.telefonica.com/en/communication-room/blog/direct-device-satellite-service-complement-mobile-networks/
5. Federal Communications Commission DA 25-197,  https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-25-197A1.pdf
6. Designing Efficient Satellite Links: A Review of the Link Budget Analysis - Qorvo,  https://www.qorvo.com/design-hub/blog/designing-efficient-satellite-links-a-review-of-the-link-budget-analysis
7. Next-Generation BlueBird - AST SpaceMobile,  https://ast-science.com/next-gen-bluebird/
8. SIZE MATTERS - Comparing Size of AST BlueBirds Phased Arrays to Other D2D Providers : r/ASTSpaceMobile - Reddit,  https://www.reddit.com/r/ASTSpaceMobile/comments/1fjqf1b/size_matters_comparing_size_of_ast_bluebirds/
9. SpaceX - Satellite Constellation - NewSpace Index,  https://www.newspace.im/constellations/spacex-starlink-v2-mini
10. Practical Use of Starlink Downlink Tones for Positioning - PMC - NIH,  https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10056358/
11. Non-terrestrial networks: The next big thing in 5G - Electronic Products,  https://www.edn.com/non-terrestrial-networks-the-next-big-thing-in-5g/
12. A First Look into Starlink's Direct Satellite-to-Device Radio Access Network through Crowdsourced Measurements - arXiv,  https://arxiv.org/html/2506.00283v7
13. [Blog] NTN and TN networks for the 6G era: technology overview and regulatory challenges,  https://research.samsung.com/blog/NTN-and-TN-networks-for-the-6G-era-technology-overview-and-regulatory-challenges
14. Lynk Global plans satellite-to-cellphone services - Connectivity Business News,  https://connectivitybusiness.com/news/lynk-global-plans-satellite-to-cellphone-services/
15. 5G from Space: An Overview of 3GPP Non-Terrestrial Networks - arXiv,  https://arxiv.org/pdf/2103.09156
16. Starlink - Wikipedia,  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink
17. SpaceX unveils first batch of larger upgraded Starlink satellites - Spaceflight Now,  https://spaceflightnow.com/2023/02/26/spacex-unveils-first-batch-of-larger-upgraded-starlink-satellites/
18. Shaky Signal, High Potential: T-Mobile Users Put Cellular Starlink Beta to the Test | PCMag,  https://www.pcmag.com/news/testing-cellular-starlink-tmobile-beta-shaky-signal-high-potential
19. A First Look into Starlink's Direct Satellite-to-Device Radio Access Network through Crowdsourced Measurements - arXiv,  https://arxiv.org/html/2506.00283v5
20. SECOND GENERATION STARLINK SATELLITES,  https://starlink.com/public-files/Gen2StarlinkSatellites.pdf
21. How it Works - AST SpaceMobile,  https://ast-science.com/how-it-works/
22. Everything you need to know about Amazon Leo, Amazon's satellite broadband network,  https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/innovation-at-amazon/what-is-amazon-project-kuiper
23. Amazon Leo - Wikipedia,  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazon_Leo
24. Insights | Connecting the World - Space Capital,  https://www.spacecapital.com/blogs/connecting-the-world
25. Single Network Future: Supplemental Coverage From Space; Space Innovation,  https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/04/30/2024-06669/single-network-future-supplemental-coverage-from-space-space-innovation
26. FCC's “Supplemental Coverage from Space” Rules Take Effect May 30; New Licensing Framework Expands Satellite-to-Smartphone Coverage | Inside Global Tech,  https://www.insideglobaltech.com/2024/04/30/fcc-acts-to-expand-satellite-to-smartphone-coverage-supplemental-coverage-from-space-rules-will-enable-partnerships-between-satellite-operators-and-wireless-network-providers-in-the/
27. DA 25-815 Released: September 5, 2025 SPACE BUREAU, WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU, AND PUBLIC SAFETY AND HOMELAND SECURITY - Federal Communications Commission,  https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-25-815A1.pdf
28. We've Tested The T-Mobile Starlink Beta: Here's What We Found | SatelliteInternet.com,  https://www.satelliteinternet.com/resources/we-test-t-mobile-starlink-beta/
29. T-Mobile Starlink Direct to Cell Review - Testing in the Mountains | DISHYtech,  https://www.dishytech.com/t-mobile-starlink-direct-to-cell-review/
30. Starlink: low-earth orbit satellites could ruin radio astronomy - Polytechnique Insights,  https://www.polytechnique-insights.com/en/columns/space/starlink-low-earth-orbit-satellites-could-ruin-radio-astronomy/
31. Starlink satellite electronics interfere with radio telescopes - Max-Planck-Gesellschaft,  https://www.mpg.de/20610867/radi-satellite-constellations
32. Light pollution from satellite mega-constellations threaten space-based observations,  https://physicsworld.com/a/light-pollution-from-satellite-mega-constellations-threaten-space-based-observations/
33. AST SpaceMobile Unfolds Giant Satellites, Astronomers Fret About Light Pollution | PCMag,  https://www.pcmag.com/news/ast-spacemobile-unfolds-giant-satellites-astronomers-fret-about-light-pollution
34. I Tested Video Chats on T-Mobile's Cellular Starlink, and It Was Pretty Mind-Blowing,  https://www.pcmag.com/news/i-tested-video-chats-on-t-mobiles-cellular-starlink-and-it-was-pretty-mind
35. I Tested Video Chats on T-Mobile's Cellular Starlink, and It Was Pretty Mind-Blowing,  https://uk.pcmag.com/wireless-carriers/160105/i-tested-video-chats-on-t-mobiles-cellular-starlink-and-it-was-pretty-mind-blowing
36. 3GPP shifts focus toward 6G while continuing work on 5G-advanced - FirstNet Authority,  https://firstnet.gov/newsroom/blog/3gpp-shifts-focus-toward-6g-while-continuing-work-5g-advanced
37. Non-Terrestrial Network Basics, Advantages, and Challenges | Keysight,  https://www.keysight.com/us/en/cmp/topics/non-terrestrial-network-basics-advantages-and-challenges.html
38. February 22, 2024 FCC FACT SHEET* Single Network Future: Supplemental Coverage from Space Report and Order and Further Notice of,  https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-400678A1.pdf
39. 6G standardization – an overview of timeline and high-level technology principles - Ericsson,  https://www.ericsson.com/en/blog/2024/3/6g-standardization-timeline-and-technology-principles
40. AST SpaceMobile targets 'intermittent' national service in early 2026 - Light Reading,  https://www.lightreading.com/satellite/ast-spacemobile-targets-intermittent-national-coverage-in-early-2026
41. AT&T preps beta D2D satellite service with AST SpaceMobile - Light Reading,  https://www.lightreading.com/satellite/at-t-preps-beta-d2d-satellite-service-with-ast-spacemobile
42. Amazon wins approval to enter Nigeria's satellite internet market - Ecofin Agency,  https://www.ecofinagency.com/news-digital/1401-51928-amazon-wins-approval-to-enter-nigeria-s-satellite-internet-market
43. FCC Clears 7,500 more Starlink Gen2 Satellites, SpaceX Given Deployment Deadlines & New Operating Flexibilities,  https://www.outlookbusiness.com/news/fcc-clears-7500-more-starlink-gen2-satellites-spacex-given-deployment-deadlines-new-operating-flexibilities
44. Satellite AI Powers AST SpaceMobile's Next-Gen BlueBird Launches - AI CERTs,  https://www.aicerts.ai/news/satellite-ai-powers-ast-spacemobiles-next-gen-bluebird-launches/
45. How Does Satellite Phone Service Work? | T-Mobile,  https://www.t-mobile.com/dialed-in/wireless/how-satellite-phone-service-works
46. Lynk and Omnispace Announce Plans to Merge to Deliver Next-Generation Global Direct-to-Device (D2D) Connectivity,  https://lynk.world/news/lynk-and-omnispace-announce-plans-to-merge-to-deliver-next-generation-global-direct-to-device-d2d-connectivity/
47. AST SpaceMobile comments on launch delays - SatNews,  https://news.satnews.com/2025/11/12/ast-spacemobile-is-experiencing-launch-delays/