TL;DR —
This section delves into the proof process of Proposition 2.4, leveraging Lemmas 8.1, 5.8, and 8.2, showcasing its importance in Dirichlet L-function theory.
Author:
(1) Yitang Zhang.
Table of Links
- Abstract & Introduction
- Notation and outline of the proof
- The set Ψ1
- Zeros of L(s, ψ)L(s, χψ) in Ω
- Some analytic lemmas
- Approximate formula for L(s, ψ)
- Mean value formula I
- Evaluation of Ξ11
- Evaluation of Ξ12
- Proof of Proposition 2.4
- Proof of Proposition 2.6
- Evaluation of Ξ15
- Approximation to Ξ14
- Mean value formula II
- Evaluation of Φ1
- Evaluation of Φ2
- Evaluation of Φ3
- Proof of Proposition 2.5
Appendix A. Some Euler products
Appendix B. Some arithmetic sums
10. Proof of Proposition 2.4
The goal of this section is to prove Proposition 2.4. We continue to assume 1 ≤ j ≤ 3.

By Lemma 8.1 we have



The contour of integration is moved in the same way as the proof of Lemma 8.1. Thus, by Lemma 5.8 and 8.2,

This yields (10.8) since the function

Thus, with simple modification, Lemma 10.1 and 10.2 apply to the sums

Noting that

and gathering the above results together we conclude

with

Hence, by Proposition 7.1,





This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license.
[story continues]
Written by
@eigenvalue
We cover research, technology, & documentation about special scalar values associated with square matrices. #EigenValue
Topics and
tags
tags
mathematical-sciences|analytic-number-theory|distribution-of-zeros|siegel's-theorem|dirichlet-l-functions|primitive-character-modulus|landau-siegel-zero|zeta-function
This story on HackerNoon has a decentralized backup on Sia.
Transaction ID: V7ucW1Hihtz-zSvjFnL4zslh1Em-By6VhLRsW47muQU
