This story on HackerNoon has a decentralized backup on Sia.
Transaction ID: 4-3h6fkaU3uUO23WrMZB5ocFPH6lzVP3TgonSC7eQe8
Cover

Google’s Browser Contracts Are Exclusive: Its Relationship With Firefox, Opera, and More

Written by @legalpdf | Published on 2024/8/12

TL;DR
Google has default search agreements with Firefox and Opera, as well as other smaller browsers.

United States of America v. Google LLC., Court Filing, retrieved on April 30, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part of this filing here. This part is 21 of 37.

C. Google’s Browser Contracts Are Exclusive

863. Google has default search agreements with Firefox and Opera, as well as other smaller browsers. Supra ¶¶ 310–318 (§ III.F.3).

864. The exclusive defaults secured by Google’s RSAs with third-party browsers cover roughly 2.3% of all U.S. general search queries. Tr. 5763:14–22 (Whinston (Pls. Expert)) (discussing UPXD104 at 36).

865. Google’s exclusive default position on browsers has excluded rivals from search shares they could get absent Google’s contracts. For example, Google has projected that a rival GSE would receive a significant share of the queries on third-party browsers if the rival won the default. Infra ¶¶ 914–926.

866. Similar to its conversations with Apple, supra ¶¶ 762–778 (§ VI.A.2.e), DuckDuckGo has pitched private browsing mode integration with browsers but has been unsuccessful; these browsers’ contracts with Google were “the common theme.” Tr. 2048:9– 2050:1 (Weinberg (DuckDuckGo)) (listing Samsung’s S Browser, Mozilla’s Firefox browser, and Opera’s browser); UPX0787 (DuckDuckGo pitching private browsing mode to Mozilla).

Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.

This court case retrieved on April 30, 2024, storage.courtlistener is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.

[story continues]


Written by
@legalpdf
Legal PDFs of important tech court cases are far too inaccessible for the average reader... until now.

Topics and
tags
google|google-monopoly|google-antitrust-trial|web-browsers|google-and-firefox|us-google-antitrust-lawsuit|google-ad-tech-monopoly|google-lawsuits
This story on HackerNoon has a decentralized backup on Sia.
Transaction ID: 4-3h6fkaU3uUO23WrMZB5ocFPH6lzVP3TgonSC7eQe8