A true story of good intentions, missing architecture, and a backend that almost took the whole system down.


The Setup

We were brought in to audit an internal logistics platform that had been under development for five years. The budget? Roughly €15,000 per month — totaling just under €900,000.

At first glance, everything seemed functional. But once we started digging into the code and infrastructure, we found a system on the edge of collapse. Not because of bad intentions — but because of years of well-meaning decisions made under pressure.

What Went Wrong

This wasn’t just technical debt. It was digital quicksand.

Why This Happens

We see this pattern often:

And always the same request:

“Can you build us an MVP in 3 months?”

Yes — but only if we agree what minimum and viable really mean.

What It Took to Fix It

Here’s what we proposed after the audit:

Not a quick fix. Not a cheap one. But a path forward that could actually scale.

We’re still working with this client today — not just rebuilding software, but helping them rethink how they operate digitally.

The Takeaway

Tech debt isn’t always the result of bad developers. It’s often the outcome of survival mode — building just enough to stay afloat.

But eventually, systems that were never designed to scale… don’t.

You don’t always have to rebuild. But if you do — do it right.