TL;DR —
Twitter v. Elon Musk Court Filing by Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, July 12, 2022 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 16 of 31: .FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS- Musk grasps for an out
Twitter v. Elon Musk Court Filing by Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, July 12, 2022 is part of
Feature Image: HackerNoon’s Midjourney AI, Prompt “CEO trying to exit”
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
VI. Musk grasps for an out
63. Musk wanted an escape. But the merger agreement left him little room. With no financing contingency or diligence condition, the agreement gave Musk no out absent a Company Material Adverse Effect or a material covenant breach by Twitter. Musk had to try to conjure one of those.
Continue reading here
[story continues]
Written by
@legalpdf
Legal PDFs of important tech court cases are far too inaccessible for the average reader... until now.
Topics and
tags
tags
elon-musk|twitter|twitter-v.-elon-musk|social-media|breach-of-contract|business|legal|lawyer|hackernoon-es|hackernoon-hi|hackernoon-zh|hackernoon-vi|hackernoon-fr|hackernoon-pt|hackernoon-ja
This story on HackerNoon has a decentralized backup on Sia.
Transaction ID: LSjswp8BwOrVX6qxZwnY7sceFpLcTEswrr3n9QrtjtA