While the technological breakthroughs accelerate, a simple question arises. Can technology ever slow down? Throughout history, each innovation – whether the wheel, electricity, or the first computers has led human society to the next stage. But now, innovation seems to develop in a nonlinear, almost exponential way. The once charted course of technological advances is now revealing itself before us, pushing not only the limits of it but also the social and ethical implications of its development.

From biotechnology to artificial intelligence (AI), innovation is keeping pace with our ability to comprehend its effects. As we move into newer and more distant technological territories, we marvel: Are we creating the future or is the future creating us?

The Accelerating Pace of Innovation

Technologically, things used to work in a clear and concrete way: fire warmed, the wheel facilitated travel, and computers opened up new levels of business and communication. Today's technologies, particularly in fields like AI, biotech, and neural interfaces, are not tools, though; they are systems that enhance themselves and sometimes with results that are unpredictable.

Take artificial intelligence, for example. What started off as simple algorithms for accomplishing something particular has now evolved into strong models capable of learning, reasoning, and even creating. GPT-4 can create text that sounds like a human, while DALL·E creates complex images out of a text prompt.

AI now reaches almost every aspect of the economy, ranging from medicine to banking to entertainment, and a McKinsey report predicts a $13 trillion injection into the global economy by 2030.

But along with progress comes complexity. AI transforms our economy and society, but also questions basic things. At the very head of this list is algorithmic bias. Despite all progress, AI systems such as facial recognition software or recruitment algorithms continue to exhibit racial and gender biases, as the Global Observatory shows.

The further we go, the more we are unable to deal with these ethical dilemmas. Therefore, the question of whether technology has an end becomes harder than ever.

The Man-Machine Equation: A Delicate Balance

At the heart of technological advancement is the man-machine equation. Human creates technology, but technology, conversely, creates new human capabilities, broadening the frontiers of the natural and the augmented.

Take biotechnology. A gene editor tool, CRISPR-Cas9, has the potential to eradicate genetic disease. But it also poses the threat of "designer babies," the power to select genetic traits for non-medical purposes. A report from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) was one that covered the promise and ethics in these technologies, questioning where the line between cure and enhancement was drawn.

So also with brain interfaces such as Elon Musk's Neuralink effort, which promises hope for new possibilities for people with neurological disorders. Neuralink will connect the human brain directly to computers, promising hope to patients with spinal cord injuries. But it also raises existential questions: When do we cross the line from human enhancement to manipulation? Do we tamper with the natural processes of the brain, or is this another step in the further evolution of humankind?

As these technologies develop, we are compelled to wonder: Can we actually continue controlling the systems that we create, or have we crossed a point where control becomes increasingly tenuous?

As technologies like AI and gene editing develop, they outpace our ability to regulate them. Take self-driving cars, for example. They promise to reduce road deaths and emissions, with a European Commission report suggesting they could cut carbon emissions by 90% by 2050. But they also introduce a new ethical question: in case of an accident, who is responsible? In some situations, the car may be required to make life-saving decisions that challenge moral principles.

Similarly, the Internet of Things (IoT) and surveillance technologies threaten the security and privacy of information. As more smart devices encroach on all walks of life: How do we protect personal information without stifling innovation? The speed of technological innovation and legislative fallout is expanding.

Governments and regulators are lagging behind, generally subjecting citizens to unforeseen effects. Even the legal system itself is far from well-equipped to deal with the novel ethics arising each passing day with the growth of technologies.

The Limitless Future of Technology

So, can technology ever cease to exist? Technically, no. Note that in my previous article, I said that technology is killing creativity. But inventions are gathering momentum at a mind-boggling rate, and each grand step forward leads to new find-outs. But the question that we must address is not whether technology will endure but how to rein in its development.

Technology, as it exists now, can be equated to an irresistible force. But it is our duty to direct it for the benefit of all. It is the ethical frameworks and regulatory governance that will decide whether technology serves or kills humanity. It is about identifying the balance between responsibility and innovation.

For example, the Blueprint AI Bill of Rights is the first step towards protecting against the threat of AI. Similarly and the last example, institutions such as the World Health Organization (WHO) are beginning to establish guidelines for the ethical application of gene-editing technologies. While the above are initial steps, they reflect a growing recognition of the need for regulation during times when technology is advancing at a rate faster than ethics and the law.

While technological growth can be boundless, the problem now is that we ought to have this boundless future for all of humanity. The restless pace of innovation creates unprecedented potential but also great risks. We must not only consider the promises of the technologies we are creating but also the peril they bring. The future is indeed boundless, but it is up to us to establish its rules.