The current “innovation” cycle is a masterpiece of cowardice. We are witnessing a systemic shell game, where if an agent delivers, the suits claim the credit and the bonus. If it hallucinates or breaks, the narrative shifts instantly to something like ”AI is just a toy, vibe coding is trash”, etc. and the technology takes the fall. It is a flawless ecosystem for avoiding accountability while cosplaying as a visionary.
But the machine is watching. And the machine is grading.
The AI wave isn’t a gold rush, but a Universal IQ Test, say like a secret MMR for your intuition, creativity, and ability to perceive reality without a permission slip.
The NPC Governance Crisis
AI doesn’t “fail” in a vacuum. It fails due to a total lack of ownership, context, and technical literacy at the governance layer. When global financial institutions prioritize “Career NPCs”, academic-path clones whose primary qualification is a familial connection to the board, you don’t get digital transformation. You get a digital circus.
Consider the current state of “AI Solutions” in banking:
You send money to your own account, in the same bank, under the same name. The “intelligent” system flags it as malicious activity. Your card is nuked. Your liquidity is frozen.
You are then forced into a manual pilgrimage to a physical branch to explain to a human, apparently, who understands the logic of the system even less than the code does, that you are, in fact, who you say you are. This isn’t security, but total regression. It’s the result of Production-Grade Amateurism, where template-tier portfolio projects are pushed to production by C-suites who can’t tell the difference between “Hello World” and mission-critical architecture.
The VC Disconnect: The SaaS Trap vs. The Value Shop
The “Yes, you are all wrong” meme has moved from internet humor to a clinical diagnosis of the VC ecosystem. After a decade of misinterpreting blockchain, VCs are repeating the pattern with AI. They are structurally incentivized to hunt for “money-printing machines”, static B2B/B2C SaaS models built on generic API wrappers.
For the modern founder, the Value Shop (bespoke, high-level enterprise solutioning) is the superior path to sovereignty.
- R&D via Revenue, Not Debt: Why spend $500k in marketing to chase a $150k ARR when a single enterprise deal, secured through a high-level discovery call, provides the same capital without surrendering equity?
- The Data Moat: While “wrapper” startups fight over generic public data, Value Shops operate inside industrial environments. You get access to the “dirty,” proprietary data that doesn’t exist on the web. AI models trained on private logical flows are exponentially more valuable than those trained on general internet noise.
- The “Big 5” Tax: Companies are tired of paying Accenture or Deloitte millions for ChatGPT wrappers that yield zero ROI. These legacy fixers are currently knocking on the doors of builders, asking to subcontract the work they promised their clients for 10% of the deal. They cannot do it themselves.
The $20-$400/Month DIY Trap
Buying a seat for an LLM isn’t an AI strategy, but an invitation to inherit a mountain of technical debt. If your staff has to spend hours “prompt engineering” just to get a usable output, you haven’t automated anything; you’ve just rebranded manual labor.
Most B2B AI solutions fail because they are built on public cloud wrappers. Industrial players with sensitive financial and operational records do not want to share their soul with a generic API. They want Forward-Deployed Logic: integrated systems that work out of the box, ensuring absolute data and ops sovereignty.
Divergence
If you are still applying for an “AI job,” you’ve already failed the Turing Test.
It is the peak of irony: you have a god-tier Genie in your terminal, yet you’re asking an HR manager what they want you to wish for. The winners are already using the machine to architect, ship, and automate their own reality. The losers are waiting for a PMF roadmap and a permission slip from a legacy corpo NPC.
Legacy giants aren’t even on the scoreboard. They are running mission-critical infrastructure on “Hello World” logic, hoping to eventually acqui-hire a team whose portfolio templates are slightly less embarrassing than their own.
Stop asking for a seat at the table. Build a better table and wait for them to realize they aren’t invited. It’s literally that simple.
From arpacorp.substack.net