Between 2000 and 2010 in most jurisdictions, such as the United States and Canada, most of the European countries, Russia, South Africa, India, Singapore, South Korea, China and Japan (these are just some countries) adopted the legislation on KYC and AML procedures (anti-money laundering). As a result, banks and related financial institutions started to comply with the requirements of anti-money laundering legislation.
In the crypto community, the KYC procedure was onboarding with skepticism, as users were afraid to disclose their data, which could fall into the hands of scammers. Moreover, according to many crypto users, the KYC procedure contradicted the very idea of anonymity when using cryptocurrencies. However, with the growth of popularity, the development of infrastructure, and the adoption of the cryptocurrency payments in many countries around the world, the opinion of most users has changed.
Survey results
A KickAcademy poll among 624 respondents from Indonesia, USA, Russia, India, and Vietnam and a number of other countries actively trading crypto assets on exchanges indicates a change of opinion among the community of active crypto-users.
Conclusion
2. Most of the surveyed users understand and positively appreciate the fact that passing the KYC for trading on the exchange is a requirement of state regulators. Moreover, the vast majority of respondents are anticipating the clear regulation of cryptocurrency trading from their governments, and expect that with the KYC in place, it will become much easier to convert digital assets to fiat money, hedge risks, and use other financial services in the cryptocurrency sphere. Nevertheless, about 20% of the survey participants are negative because of doubts about the safety of personal data in the hands of third parties and the reluctance to disclose their identity to pay taxes on income from trading digital assets on the exchange.
3. The well-grounded fear of users for the safety of their confidential information poses a cryptographic industry a non-trivial task to maintain a balance between security and compliance with the state regulations. The one possible option would be RegTech 3.0, a regulatory technology that digitizes a wide range of regulatory compliance processes. RegTech technology is designed to reduce costs, and improve user protection and risk identification well before the regulatory intervention. This technology uses a combination of new solutions, such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, RPA (robotic processes automation), and biometrics, but at the same time indicates significant changes in the development strategy.
4. At this stage of Kick Ecosystem product and services development, choosing a reliable KYC provider partner on the KickEX exchange is one of the highest priorities. We intend to use the services of Sum&Substance company which has already established itself as a leader in the KYC/AML market in Central and Eastern Europe and Asia. Their experience and tools will help resolve issues related to costs and risks while providing our customers with the reliable protection of their data. The processing of documents and selfies of users who have passed KYC is carried out by the Sum&Substance provider. Kick Ecosystem will not store any user data on its servers, but will only receive anonymized data, which will play as additional protection against possible cyberattacks and data theft by third parties.
5. This poll once again proves the trend of a gradual shift in opinion regarding KYC from negative to neutral and positive among crypto users. Many traders and cryptocurrency holders support the opinion that — for all its side risks, — KYC has a positive effect on the convenience and security of digital assets stored on exchange accounts of crypto users and traders.